Upload the denial. AI builds the case. You send it.
Pick a preloaded case from common denial categories. The full flow runs instantly. Nothing to upload.
Upload your own EOB or denial letter. AI analyzes your real case and drafts the appeal.
It classifies what you uploaded, reads the denial against the claim and the EOB, works out what caused it, and drafts the appeal. All of that happens before anyone on your team opens it.
Drop in your EOB or denial letter. Add clinical notes, prior auth records, or fee schedules if you have them. More context means a stronger appeal.
Bill Matters reads every document uploaded, sorts them by type, and extracts key case information automatically.
The AI identifies the real denial reason. Not just the surface code. It checks the claim, the payer rules, and current state insurance laws.
If the appeal needs a document not yet provided, the AI names it and explains exactly why. You upload only what is specifically needed.
Your team reads the draft. Edit anything. Export as Word or PDF and submit through your existing process.
The appeal goes to the payer through the process you already use, and the money you had already earned comes back into the practice.
A payer-specific appeal is generated with evidence, citations, policy references, and an exhibit list. Built for that case, not a template.
Most rejected bills are not random. They fall into a short list, and once you know which one you are looking at, the fix gets a lot clearer.
Authorisation was missing, wrong, or never came through in time. Most common with imaging, surgery, specialty drugs and therapy. Fixing it afterwards often means starting the request again.
Coverage had lapsed, changed, or never applied to that service on that date. Working out which plan was actually active can take longer than the appeal.
Wrong or outdated CPT, ICD-10 or HCPCS codes, including ones that trip a bundling edit. One mismatched code flips a whole claim from payable to rejected.
The claim went out after the payer's deadline, sometimes by a day or two. Most payers treat this as final, which makes the filing window the least forgiving rule in the system.
A corrected claim gets flagged as a duplicate, even though it was resubmitted specifically to fix an earlier error. The payer sees matching details and rejects the newer one.
Clinical notes do not clearly support what was billed. Payers increasingly use their own AI to catch this at scale, so the gap has to be closed with real documentation, not a better argument.
The claim went to the wrong payer when another plan should have paid first. It can bounce between payers more than once before anyone sorts out who owes what.
Run a denial through and see what the analysis names as the real reason. Your first appeal is free.
Try itUpload an EOB or denial letter. That is the only document you need. It tells you what else would help, then drafts the appeal. Your first one is free.